Introduction
The UK is home to a wide variety of faith communities, each of
which has its own distinctive tradition of voluntary action. Indeed,
as the research upon which this report is based shows, many of these
communities and their institutions seem to depend almost entirely
upon voluntary action for their survival: a large proportion of
community members volunteer regularly and an even larger number
occasionally.
For a variety of reasons, policy makers and practitioners are taking
a greater interest in faith communities and the services they provide
to their members. The UK government, for example, sees such communities
as potentially valuable allies in tackling social exclusion, as
they can provide access to some of the most marginalised groups
in society. Therefore it is inviting faith communities to open up
their services to other sections of the population, and to apply
for statutory funding in the same way as other local welfare providers
For its part, the UK voluntary sector is keen to discover how far
the services provided by faith communities complement or duplicate
those provided by other voluntary and community organisations. It
also wishes to include faith communities in local decision-making
about community development.
This report is based on the findings of an exploratory study that
looked at:
- how people in different faith communities volunteer
- what motivates them to volunteer
- how their volunteering is organised
- how their volunteering is resourced
- what the relationship is between faith communities and local
networks.
What kind of volunteering?
Voluntary action within faith communities seldom conforms to the
dominant Western concept of volunteering: that is, activity that
is carried out through an organisation and where the distinction
between volunteer and beneficiary is clear. Instead, faith-based
volunteering is often informal, evolving spontaneously out of local
groups or congregations, and shows a strong bias towards mutual
aid.
Our research provides no evidence that different belief systems
give rise to different kinds of voluntary action. In fact, the volunteering
carried out within the various faith-based communities studied has
many features in common: individuals help each other out or come
together in groups to tackle local issues – usually spontaneously,
as an accepted part of everyday life, and only occasionally through
more organised services.
The types of volunteering observed can be divided into four broad
categories:
1. Routine activities
2. Welfare services
3. Festival-based volunteering
4. Responses to specific events
Routine activities. Certain regular voluntary
activities help to give a structure to the life of the faith community.
These include: making food offerings to co-religionists; cleaning
and maintaining the place of worship; fundraising; organising cultural
activities (such as language classes for young people); and running
clubs (for example, martial arts, football or the arts).
Welfare services. Some of the services provided
within faith communities are more specifically welfare-orientated:
for example, organising care, meals, befriending and social activities
for older members; running luncheon clubs for single people; and
giving advice on, say, immigration or healthy eating. Some of these
services are also made available to the wider local community: for
example, one Buddhist community offered free meditation classes.
Festival-based volunteering. In most faith communities,
however, the largest mobilisation of volunteers occurs at festival
time. People are involved in a range of tasks, such as preparing
food, organising special services, decorating places of worship,
arranging fundraising events and raising awareness of the meaning
of the festival.
Responses to specific events. Many faith communities
are involved in responding to crises such as earthquakes, floods,
famines and cyclones. They may focus on helping their own international
faith community, or they may help other groups of affected people.
The value base of volunteering
There are also similarities across faith communities in the values
that inspire their members’ voluntary action.
All the faiths studied expect their adherents to give money and,
to a lesser extent, time. Respondents said that they try to live
according to certain guiding principles, which might be summarised
as follows:
- to help others by giving time and/or money
- to live according to the spirit of one’s religion and
the values it proposes
- to act selflessly
- to help people in need
- to be concerned about social injustice and inequality.
Most members of faith communities view their voluntary action as
‘doing God’s work’ – usually interpreted
as providing practical help – rather than as an opportunity
to attract others to the faith. Explicit proselytising is rare.
The motivations to volunteer
Volunteering by members of faith communities seems to be motivated
by a combination of factors. Individuals may, for example, feel
a desire to help meet local need or to pass on the practices of
their faith – or they may be inspired by a sense of duty to
the international community of their faith. There is also the tendency
for people of the same faith (described by respondent as the ‘common
core’) to come together to socialise, to help each other out
and to support their places of worship. Also, community leaders
and local philanthropists often encourage members of the faith community
to get involved.
The motivation to volunteer can also be conditioned by the following
external factors:
Environmental
- How long the community has been established in its current
setting
- Whether the community feels it is ‘mainstream’
or ‘minority’
- The geographical cohesiveness of the community
- The extent of deprivation in the neighbourhood where the community
lives
Socio-economic
- The resources and number of people in the community
- The socio-economic status of members of the community
- The propensity to give in that particular community
How is the voluntary action organised?
The most characteristic ways of organising voluntary activity within
faith-based communities are:
- Informal or associational groupings, where
people who share a faith, ethnic identity or gender support each
other and take part in activities together, but are not organised
into the sort of structures that are typical of the wider UK voluntary
sector, or
- Individual-centred, where a person has the
confidence or sense of belonging to move around communities and
get things done by themselves or through others, but does not
operate as, or through, an organisation..
How exactly faith communities organise themselves depends on factors
such as how large the community is, whether it is working locally,
nationally or internationally, and whether it is providing formal
or informal assistance. In all these activities, all faiths depend
to a much greater extent on volunteers than on paid workers –
and some work only through volunteers.
The problem of resources
In order to provide the services described above, most faith communities
have to depend upon their own resources: in other words, their own
volunteers and the money they can acquire through donations from
community members and collections at religious festivals. The resources
they obtain from elsewhere – such as grants from local authorities,
charitable foundations and regeneration agencies – are never
sufficient to support the whole organisation.
In fact, with only occasional exceptions, the faith communities
studied seem to have few external links of any kind, either with
local or national government or with the voluntary sector. They
know little about the sources of support available to the mainstream
voluntary sector and often lack the contacts and the confidence
to find out.
In view of this isolation, the fact that government is encouraging
faith communities to seek funding to run local services should raise
some concerns. Although such communities have plenty of experience
of supporting their own members, they have traditionally provided
these services on a voluntary basis – so how would government
funding affect their voluntary nature, their spiritual mission and
their faith identity? Offering them public resources might turn
out to be a mixed blessing. Some communities may turn down the offer,
preferring to retain their faith identity and their distinctive
approach to voluntary action.
But even if a faith community does not want statutory support,
its choice should be based on knowledge rather than ignorance. So
public agencies, and perhaps local voluntary sector umbrella bodies
as well, need to reach out to faith-based communities and show them
how they can – if they wish – secure more external resources.
Some other question marks
There are other question marks about how faith communities can
be involved in delivering mainstream social welfare. For example:
- Some faith groups work solely for their own members, whereas
others work for the wider local community. In view of the current
campaign to encourage communities to work together more closely,
how can the faith groups that wish to build bridges be helped
to do so? Do communities need to bond within themselves before
they can have the confidence to build bridges?
- Community practitioners have drawn attention to the fragility
of religious pluralism in the UK. Conflict could arise between
a faith-based community and a secular community, or between two
communities that have what their members see as competing value
systems. How can voluntary action between communities help to
cultivate a shared sense of belonging and an understanding of
each other’s values?
- Many communities have specific roles for men and women, leading
to clearly demarcated areas of activity. There may be pressure
to challenge the traditions of some minority cultures in order
to create ‘bridging’ as well as ‘bonding’
social capital.
The research
This report is based on 25 interviews with leaders and active members of faith communities carried out between November 2001 and March 2002 in Leicester, Liverpool and Luton. The following faiths were represented: Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Jainism, Judaism and Sikhism.
To order your copy of this fully referenced report by Priya Lukka and Michael Locke with Andri Sorteri-Proctor, please visit the Volunteering England web site, or for more information about the Institute for Volunteering Research or the National Centre for Volunteering call 020 7520 8900 or e-mail instvolres@aol.com
|